pressure dressing - PMC

Result Filters

You searched 8+ million full text articles

Try this search in 34+ million citations and abstracts

PMC Full-Text Search Results

Items: 1 to 20 of 53380

<< First< Prev

Page of 2669

Next >Last >>

Select item 84070201.

Compression bandages or stockings versus no compression for treating venous leg ulcers

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 2021(7): CD013397. Published online 2021 Jul 26. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013397.pub2

PMCID:: PMC8407020

Article PDF–1.1M

Select item 104706492.

Current status and progress in research on dressing management for diabetic foot ulcer

Pingnan Jiang, Qianhang Li, Yanhong Luo, Feng Luo, Qingya Che, Zhaoyu Lu, Shuxiang Yang, Yan Yang, Xia Chen, Yulan Cai

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14: 1221705. Published online 2023 Aug 17. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1221705

PMCID:: PMC10470649

Article PDF–2.9M

Select item 65170413.

Dressings and topical agents for preventing pressure ulcers

Zena EH Moore, Joan Webster, Cochrane Wounds Group

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 2018(12): CD009362. Published online 2018 Dec 6. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009362.pub3

PMCID:: PMC6517041

Article PDF–1011K

Select item 64816094.

Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers

Maggie J Westby, Jo C Dumville, Marta O Soares, Nikki Stubbs, Gill Norman, Cochrane Wounds Group

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun; 2017(6): CD011947. Published online 2017 Jun 22. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011947.pub2

PMCID:: PMC6481609

Article PDF–2.0M

Select item 64639545.

Protease‐modulating matrix treatments for healing venous leg ulcers

Maggie J Westby, Gill Norman, Jo C Dumville, Nikki Stubbs, Nicky Cullum, Cochrane Wounds Group

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec; 2016(12): CD011918. Published online 2016 Dec 15. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011918.pub2

PMCID:: PMC6463954

Article PDF–824K

Select item 71928566.

Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 2020(5): CD009261. Published online 2020 May 1. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub5

Update in:: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 2020(6): CD009261.

PMCID:: PMC7192856

Article PDF–2.0M

Select item 73895207.

Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 2020(6): CD009261. Published online 2020 Jun 15. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub6

Update in:: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 2022(4): CD009261.

PMCID:: PMC7389520

Article PDF–1.8M

Select item 64856188.

Foam dressings for treating pressure ulcers

Rachel M Walker, Brigid M Gillespie, Lukman Thalib, Niall S Higgins, Jennifer A Whitty, Cochrane Wounds Group

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct; 2017(10): CD011332. Published online 2017 Oct 12. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011332.pub2

PMCID:: PMC6485618

Article PDF–768K

Select item 63463539.

Impact of Casting and Splinting Manipulations on Below-Dressing Pressures: An Experimental Model

Nikhil Adapa, Kanu S. Goyal

Hand (N Y) 2019 Jan; 14(1): 48–55. Published online 2018 Sep 6. doi: 10.1177/1558944718799391

PMCID:: PMC6346353

Article PDF–763K

Select item 651355810.

Dressings and topical agents for treating venous leg ulcers

Gill Norman, Maggie J Westby, Amber D Rithalia, Nikki Stubbs, Marta O Soares, Jo C Dumville, Cochrane Wounds Group

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 2018(6): CD012583. Published online 2018 Jun 15. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012583.pub2

PMCID:: PMC6513558

Article PDF–2.7M

Select item 794946811.

The biomechanical protective effects of a treatment dressing on the soft tissues surrounding a non‐offloaded sacral pressure ulcer

Dafna Schwartz, Amit Gefen

Int Wound J. 2019 Jun; 16(3): 684–695. Published online 2019 Jan 29. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13082

PMCID:: PMC7949468

Article PDF–2.5M

Select item 657309412.

Rigid dressings versus soft dressings for transtibial amputations

Li Khim Kwah, Matthew T Webb, Lina Goh, Lisa A Harvey, Cochrane Wounds Group

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 2019(6): CD012427. Published online 2019 Jun 17. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012427.pub2

PMCID:: PMC6573094

Article PDF–862K

Select item 794887813.

The biomechanical efficacy of a dressing with a soft cellulose fluff core in prophylactic use

Amit Gefen, Maja Krämer, Maik Brehm, Sören Burckardt

Int Wound J. 2020 Dec; 17(6): 1968–1985. Published online 2020 Aug 31. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13489

PMCID:: PMC7948878

Article PDF–2.9M

Select item 1041600614.

Efficacy of different types of dressings on pressure injuries: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Chunjin Zhang, Shu Zhang, Bo Wu, Kang Zou, Hong Chen

Nurs Open. 2023 Sep; 10(9): 5857–5867. Published online 2023 Jun 29. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1867

PMCID:: PMC10416006

Article PDF–1.6M

Select item 1013680615.

Wearable Smart Bandage-Based Bio-Sensors

Arie Levin, Shu Gong, Wenlong Cheng

Biosensors (Basel) 2023 Apr; 13(4): 462. Published online 2023 Apr 6. doi: 10.3390/bios13040462

PMCID:: PMC10136806

Article PDF–4.9M

Select item 887411916.

What makes a hydrogel‐based dressing advantageous for the prevention of medical device‐related pressure ulcers

Angela Grigatti, Amit Gefen

Int Wound J. 2022 Mar; 19(3): 515–530. Published online 2021 Jul 10. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13650

PMCID:: PMC8874119

Article PDF–3.3M

Select item 900328017.

Passive Millimeter-Wave Imaging for Burns Diagnostics under Dressing Materials

Amani Yousef Owda

Sensors (Basel) 2022 Apr; 22(7): 2428. Published online 2022 Mar 22. doi: 10.3390/s22072428

PMCID:: PMC9003280

Article PDF–3.6M

Select item 1083120018.

Effects of different dressings in the prevention of facial skin pressure injury related to non‐invasive ventilation: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis

Guoli Zhang, Fanghong Yan, Ruiyi Sun, Guotian Peng, Juhong Pei, Hongyan Zhang, Yuxia Ma, Lin Han

Int Wound J. 2024 Feb; 21(2): e14678. Published online 2024 Jan 31. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14678

PMCID:: PMC10831200

Article PDF–2.8M

Select item 655371819.

ZnO-NPs embedded biodegradable thiolated bandage for postoperative surgical site infection: In vitro and in vivo evaluation

Rabia Arshad, Muhammad Farhan Sohail, Hafiz Shoaib Sarwar, Hamid Saeed, Imran Ali, Sohail Akhtar, Syed Zajif Hussain, Iqra Afzal, Sarwat Jahan, Anees-ur-Rehman, Shahnaz Gul

PLoS One. 2019; 14(6): e0217079. Published online 2019 Jun 6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217079

PMCID:: PMC6553718

Article PDF–2.1M

Select item 904071020.

Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 2022(4): CD009261. Published online 2022 Apr 26. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009261.pub7

PMCID:: PMC9040710

Article PDF–2.3M

<< First< Prev

Page of 2669

Next >Last >>

Supplemental Content

Filter your results:

Manage Filters

PMC Images search for pressure dressing

Figure 2

(A) View of the dorsal part of pressure dressing in group A. (B) View of the ventral part of pressure dressing in group A. (C) View of the dorsal part of pressure dressing in group B. (D) View of the ventral part of pressure dressing in group B.

A Modified Pressure Dressing to Avoid Severe Bleeding After Circumcision With a Disposable Circumcision Suture Device and a Discussion on the Mechanism of Bleeding With the Disposable Circumcision Suture Device

Sex Med. 2021 Apr;9(2):100288.
Figure 5

Results of balloon pressure measurements over time in original PREVENA™ dressing (OPD) and self-made epicutaneous wound dressing (SMD), porcine and human. iNPWT: incisional negative pressure wound therapy; OPD: original PREVENA dressing; SMD: self-made epicutaneous wound dressing.

Biomechanical Effects of Incisional Negative Wound Pressure Dressing: An Ex Vivo Model Using Human and Porcine Abdominal Walls

Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:7058461.
Fig. 1

Basic wound VAC and silver negative pressure dressing setup is shown. The silver fabric dressing is placed between the VAC sponge and the wound. It is then sealed with an impervious sticky dressing.

Silver Negative Pressure Dressing With Vacuum-assisted Closure of Massive Pelvic and Extremity Wounds

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Mar;472(3):830-835.
FIGURE 2

Schematic diagram of the heat‐flow meter for thermal conductivity measurements of dressing materials. The dressing specimen is placed between hot and cold metal blocks. Four thermocouples are symmetrically distanced relative to the dressing sample slot (ie, two above and two below the dressing specimen) and allow to measure the thermal gradient across the dressing thickness. An external weight is placed on the top of the device, to simulate the pressure acting on the dressing specimen as it is placed between the skin and a medical device. The heat‐flow meter is computer‐controlled and temperature readings from all the thermocouples are automatically acquired and digitally stored for calculation of the thermal conductivity of the tested dressing material. The insulation that surrounds the system to facilitate a near‐axial heat flow through the dressing thickness is not illustrated here for clarity of the internal construction of the heat‐flow meter device. TEC, thermoelectric cooler

What makes a hydrogel‐based dressing advantageous for the prevention of medical device‐related pressure ulcers

Int Wound J. 2022 Mar;19(3):515-530.